|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
Music composer Ismail Darbar, father-in-law of actress Gauahar Khan, has ignited a wave of controversy with his recent statement that his son Zaid Darbar has the right to decide whether Gauahar should continue working or not. His remarks, made during a media interaction, have stirred strong reactions across social media, with many calling them regressive and patriarchal.
In his statement, Ismail Darbar explained that while he respects Gauahar as a member of the family, he believes that as her husband, Zaid holds the authority to control or restrict her work life. He said he personally wouldn’t “tolerate” certain types of content or roles if they conflicted with the family’s sense of dignity and cultural values. Citing his late wife as an example, Ismail shared that she had chosen to give up her career for the sake of family responsibilities, even when lucrative opportunities were available. According to him, such decisions reflect strength, sacrifice, and adherence to traditional values he expects the younger generation to continue.
Ismail further mentioned that he comes from what he described as a “backward family,” where conservative beliefs shaped their understanding of respectability and morality. He added that certain on-screen portrayals or performances were always considered inappropriate in their household, and he expects similar restraint within his family now that Gauahar is married to Zaid.
Gauahar Khan and Zaid Darbar, who tied the knot in 2020, are among social media’s most followed celebrity couples. They welcomed their first child in 2023 and their second baby earlier this year in September. Known for her outspoken nature and successful career, Gauahar has built a reputation for balancing her professional and personal life with grace. Her silence on this issue so far has fueled curiosity, with many waiting to see how she responds to her father-in-law’s comments.
The public reaction to Ismail Darbar’s remarks has been divided. A large section of the audience, including celebrities and women’s rights advocates, condemned the statement, calling it outdated and controlling. They argued that Gauahar, as an independent woman and mother, should have the freedom to make her own career choices without interference. On the other hand, a small segment of supporters defended Ismail’s perspective, claiming that he is simply upholding traditional family values and emphasizing respect for marital boundaries.
Despite the mixed reactions, the controversy has opened up a larger discussion about women’s autonomy in marriage, particularly in the entertainment industry. In a society that continues to evolve between tradition and modernity, questions about personal freedom, mutual respect, and gender equality remain deeply relevant.
For now, all eyes are on Gauahar and Zaid. If Gauahar chooses to respond publicly, her words could significantly influence public opinion. Similarly, Zaid’s stance whether he supports his father’s traditional outlook or stands by Gauahar’s independence will likely determine how this debate unfolds.
In a country where conversations around women’s rights are gaining momentum, this episode serves as a reminder that even in 2025, the struggle between tradition and autonomy continues to shape modern Indian families.
